|
S. R. # 99-345 - "Congressional Intent - DOJ's Options".
CLICK HERE to read "FULL TEXT".
Excerpt from Senate Report #99-345:
Subsection (c)(3) of section 3730 clarifies that the Government once it intervenes and
takes over a false claim suit brought by a private individual, may elect to pursue any
alternate remedy for recovery of the false claim which might be available under the
administrative process. The Department of Health and Human Services is currently
authorized to use administrative proceedings for the recovery of some false claims.
Earlier in this Congress, the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee favorably reported
S. 1134, the Program Fraud Civil Penalties Act, which would extend this type of
administrative mechanism for addressing false claims to all Executive agencies.
The Committee intends that if civil monetary penalty proceedings are available, the
Government may elect to pursue the claim either judicially or
through an administrative civil penalty proceeding.
- In the event that the Government chooses to proceed administratively, the qui
tam relator retains all the same rights
- to copies of filings and depositions,
- to objections of settlements or dismissals,
- to taking over the action if the Government fails to proceed with
"reasonable diligence",
- as well as to receiving a portion of any recovery.
- If the Government proceeds administratively,
- the district court shall stay the civil action pending the
administrative proceeding and
- any petitions by the relator, in order to exercise his rights, will be to
the district court.
While the Government will have the opportunity to elect its remedy, it will not
have an opportunity for dual recovery on the same claim or claims.
In other words,
- the Government must elect to pursue the false claims action
either judicially or administratively and
- if the Government declines to intervene in a qui tam action, it is
estopped from pursuing the same action administratively or in a separate
judicial action.
|